The Largest Star In The Universe Size Comparison Wordlesstech When comparing amounts of some things, but i've checked it in google which seems like "the largest, the greatest, the highest, and even the most number of. . ." are actually used more often. 1. which do we usually use for comparing numbers or amounts of some things? let's say, if there were 3 cities. 1,000 people live in city a. What is the largest lake in the world? compare this to 'the biggest lake'. to my mind, the largest is the one with the greatest surface area, the biggest may have a smaller surface area but be deeper and therefore contain more water and be 'bigger'. of course, one could just as well assign the other way but there is a distinction. i think.
The Largest Star In The Universe Size Comparison Go It When referring to a list of number is largest or biggest correct? for example, i want to find the biggest number in an array. or should it be the largest number. finally, would either biggest or. The technical term is plurality, meaning per the oed the fact of having the largest share of the votes cast, when this is less than an absolute majority. this word is used primarily in the united states. according to the article on the topic, relative majority is preferred in the united kingdom. In "the single largest factor", "single" is technically redundant, save for excluding the possibility of joint winners. when used (by someone who understands the language) it's serves as an intensifier, basically making the phrase mean "the largest factor by far". Actual numbers are highest and lowest number: 100, 200, 300 versus 1, 2, 3, for example. whereas: the greatest number of people would take great to mean largest. that's the short answer.
Largest Stars In The Universe Size Comparison Youtube Universe Size In "the single largest factor", "single" is technically redundant, save for excluding the possibility of joint winners. when used (by someone who understands the language) it's serves as an intensifier, basically making the phrase mean "the largest factor by far". Actual numbers are highest and lowest number: 100, 200, 300 versus 1, 2, 3, for example. whereas: the greatest number of people would take great to mean largest. that's the short answer. People who never married contributed the second largest group in both years, which accounted for roughly 15% then 20% of the total population of adult americans. The largest share of the region's cost estimate total belongs to projects classified as "long term", which accounts for 9% of the region's projects and 47% of the region's cost estimate total. while the statements above are numerically accurate and precise, i feel they are a bit clunky and bloated. What about the second pie chart? in the second pie chart the largest portion is less than 50%. can i still consider the group "c" as majority in it? based on the cambridge dictionary it seems ambiguous: (1) the larger number or part of something, (2) more than half of a total number or amount. In technical and common parlance, the phrase "chronological order" indicates that the items are in order of occurrence or creation, oldest first (being the first in the chronology). so it's [ 1997, 1998, 1999 ] and not [ 1999, 1998, 1997 ]. ordering most recent first as in the example given in the question is called reverse chronological ordering or inverse chronological ordering.
Saiz Size Comparison Between The Largest Known Star In People who never married contributed the second largest group in both years, which accounted for roughly 15% then 20% of the total population of adult americans. The largest share of the region's cost estimate total belongs to projects classified as "long term", which accounts for 9% of the region's projects and 47% of the region's cost estimate total. while the statements above are numerically accurate and precise, i feel they are a bit clunky and bloated. What about the second pie chart? in the second pie chart the largest portion is less than 50%. can i still consider the group "c" as majority in it? based on the cambridge dictionary it seems ambiguous: (1) the larger number or part of something, (2) more than half of a total number or amount. In technical and common parlance, the phrase "chronological order" indicates that the items are in order of occurrence or creation, oldest first (being the first in the chronology). so it's [ 1997, 1998, 1999 ] and not [ 1999, 1998, 1997 ]. ordering most recent first as in the example given in the question is called reverse chronological ordering or inverse chronological ordering.
Largest Stars Size Comparison By Colin Gaudreau On Prezi What about the second pie chart? in the second pie chart the largest portion is less than 50%. can i still consider the group "c" as majority in it? based on the cambridge dictionary it seems ambiguous: (1) the larger number or part of something, (2) more than half of a total number or amount. In technical and common parlance, the phrase "chronological order" indicates that the items are in order of occurrence or creation, oldest first (being the first in the chronology). so it's [ 1997, 1998, 1999 ] and not [ 1999, 1998, 1997 ]. ordering most recent first as in the example given in the question is called reverse chronological ordering or inverse chronological ordering.
Comments are closed.